Skip to content

Grammar Analysis: Jeremiah 18:7–10 (Conditional Prophecy Formula)

Overview

Jer 18:7–10 is the locus classicus for the conditional prophecy formula in the Hebrew Bible — the metalinguistic statement in which YHWH himself frames every oracle of judgment or promise as conditional on the addressee's moral response. The four verses comprise a symmetrical twin-oracle diptych (vv. 7–8 judgment-announcement, vv. 9–10 promise-announcement) built on identical syntactic scaffolding:

  1. A temporal-modal opener רֶגַע אֲדַבֵּר ("at-an-instant I-am-speaking") — fronted adverbial accusative of time + 1cs Piel yiqtol
  2. A purpose-direction complement עַל־גּוֹי וְעַל־מַמְלָכָה ("upon a nation and upon a kingdom") + 3× לְ + InfCon chain giving the intended effect
  3. A weqatal-headed protasis stating the reversal of the nation's posture — וְשָׁב / וְעָשָׂה
  4. A weqatal-headed apodosis stating YHWH's own reversal — וְנִחַמְתִּי ("and I will relent") — identical in both directions

The grammatical architecture is direction-neutral: the same scaffolding carries a threatened nation toward mercy (v. 8) and a favored nation toward disaster (v. 10). The formula therefore generalizes the Jonah-pattern (Jon 3:4, 10) and stands as the prophetic-theological rule the potter-parable (18:1–6) is designed to illustrate.

Text

Verse 7 (judgment-announcement opener)

Hebrew: רֶ֣גַע אֲדַבֵּ֔ר עַל־גּ֖וֹי וְעַל־מַמְלָכָ֑ה לִנְת֥וֹשׁ וְלִנְת֖וֹץ וּֽלְהַאֲבִֽיד׃ KJV: At what instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to pluck up, and to pull down, and to destroy it;

Verse 8 (judgment-protasis + apodosis)

Hebrew: וְשָׁב֙ הַגּ֣וֹי הַה֔וּא מֵרָ֣עָת֔וֹ אֲשֶׁ֥ר דִּבַּ֖רְתִּי עָלָ֑יו וְנִֽחַמְתִּי֙ עַל־הָ֣רָעָ֔ה אֲשֶׁ֥ר חָשַׁ֖בְתִּי לַעֲשׂ֥וֹת לֽוֹ׃ KJV: If that nation, against whom I have pronounced, turn from their evil, I will repent of the evil that I thought to do unto them.

Verse 9 (promise-announcement opener)

Hebrew: וְרֶ֣גַע אֲדַבֵּ֔ר עַל־גּ֖וֹי וְעַל־מַמְלָכָ֑ה לִבְנֹ֖ת וְלִנְטֹֽעַ׃ KJV: And at what instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to build and to plant it;

Verse 10 (promise-protasis + apodosis)

Hebrew: וְעָשָׂ֤ה הָרַע֙ בְּעֵינַ֔י לְבִלְתִּ֖י שְׁמֹ֣עַ בְּקוֹלִ֑י וְנִֽחַמְתִּי֙ עַל־הַטּוֹבָ֔ה אֲשֶׁ֥ר אָמַ֖רְתִּי לְהֵיטִ֥יב אוֹתֽוֹ׃ KJV: If it do evil in my sight, that it obey not my voice, then I will repent of the good, wherewith I said I would benefit them.

Word-by-Word Parsing

Jer 18:7

# Word Lemma Parsing Gloss
1 רֶגַע רגע Noun.ms.Abs moment, instant
2 אֲדַבֵּר דבר Verb.Piel.Impf.1s I speak
3 עַל על Prep upon/concerning
4 גּוֹי גוי Noun.ms.Abs nation
5 וְ ו Conj and
6 עַל על Prep upon/concerning
7 מַמְלָכָה ממלכה Noun.fs.Abs kingdom
8 לִ ל Prep to
9 נְתוֹשׁ נתשׁ Verb.Qal.InfCon pluck up, uproot
10 וְלִ ו + ל Conj + Prep and to
11 נְתוֹץ נתץ Verb.Qal.InfCon tear down
12 וּלְ ו + ל Conj + Prep and to
13 הַאֲבִיד אבד Verb.Hiphil.InfCon cause to perish / destroy

Jer 18:8

# Word Lemma Parsing Gloss
1 וְ ו Conj and
2 שָׁב שׁוב Verb.Qal.Perf.3ms (weqatal) returns / turns back
3 הַגּוֹי גוי Art + Noun.ms.Abs the nation
4 הַהוּא הוא Art + PersPron.3ms that
5 מֵ מן Prep from
6 רָעָתוֹ רעה Noun.fs.Abs + 3ms its evil
7 אֲשֶׁר אשׁר Rel particle which
8 דִּבַּרְתִּי דבר Verb.Piel.Perf.1s I have spoken
9 עָלָיו על Prep + 3ms against it
10 וְ ו Conj and
11 נִחַמְתִּי נחם Verb.Niphal.Perf.1s (weqatal) I will relent/repent
12 עַל על Prep concerning
13 הָרָעָה רעה Art + Noun.fs.Abs the evil
14 אֲשֶׁר אשׁר Rel particle which
15 חָשַׁבְתִּי חשׁב Verb.Qal.Perf.1s I purposed / thought
16 לַעֲשׂוֹת עשׂה Prep + Verb.Qal.InfCon to do
17 לוֹ ל Prep + 3ms to it

Jer 18:9

# Word Lemma Parsing Gloss
1 וְ ו Conj and
2 רֶגַע רגע Noun.ms.Abs moment, instant
3 אֲדַבֵּר דבר Verb.Piel.Impf.1s I speak
4 עַל על Prep upon/concerning
5 גּוֹי גוי Noun.ms.Abs nation
6 וְ ו Conj and
7 עַל על Prep upon/concerning
8 מַמְלָכָה ממלכה Noun.fs.Abs kingdom
9 לִ ל Prep to
10 בְנֹת בנה Verb.Qal.InfCon build
11 וְלִ ו + ל Conj + Prep and to
12 נְטֹעַ נטע Verb.Qal.InfCon plant

Jer 18:10

# Word Lemma Parsing Gloss
1 וְ ו Conj and
2 עָשָׂה עשׂה Verb.Qal.Perf.3ms (weqatal) it does
3 הָרַע רע Art + Adj.ms.Abs (substantival) the evil
4 בְּ ב Prep in
5 עֵינַי עין Noun.fd.Abs + 1s my eyes
6 לְ ל Prep so as
7 בִלְתִּי בלת Neg particle (cst) not
8 שְׁמֹעַ שׁמע Verb.Qal.InfCon to hear/obey
9 בְּ ב Prep in
10 קוֹלִי קול Noun.ms.Abs + 1s my voice
11 וְ ו Conj and
12 נִחַמְתִּי נחם Verb.Niphal.Perf.1s (weqatal) I will relent/repent
13 עַל על Prep concerning
14 הַטּוֹבָה טובה Art + Noun.fs.Abs the good
15 אֲשֶׁר אשׁר Rel particle which
16 אָמַרְתִּי אמר Verb.Qal.Perf.1s I said
17 לְ ל Prep to
18 הֵיטִיב יטב Verb.Hiphil.InfCon to do good
19 אוֹתוֹ את dir.obj marker + 3ms to it

Clause Structure (from BHSA via hebrew_parser.py)

Jer 18:7

Clause Type Domain Function Text
1 xYq0 (X-yiqtol) Q (quotation) Temporal-modal opener רֶגַע אֲדַבֵּר עַל־גּוֹי וְעַל־מַמְלָכָה
2 InfC Q Purpose 1 לִנְתוֹשׁ — "to pluck up"
3 InfC Q Purpose 2 וְלִנְתוֹץ — "and to tear down"
4 InfC Q Purpose 3 וּלְהַאֲבִיד — "and to destroy"

Jer 18:8

Clause Type Domain Function Text
1 WQtX (weqatal + subject) Q Protasis וְשָׁב הַגּוֹי הַהוּא מֵרָעָתוֹ — "if that nation turns from its evil"
2 xQt0 (relative qatal) Q Relative modifier אֲשֶׁר דִּבַּרְתִּי עָלָיו
3 WQt0 (weqatal — subjectless) Q Apodosis וְנִחַמְתִּי עַל־הָרָעָה — "then I will relent of the disaster"
4 xQt0 Q Relative modifier אֲשֶׁר חָשַׁבְתִּי לַעֲשׂוֹת לוֹ

Jer 18:9

Clause Type Domain Function Text
1 WxY0 (waw-X-yiqtol) Q Temporal-modal opener וְרֶגַע אֲדַבֵּר עַל־גּוֹי וְעַל־מַמְלָכָה
2 InfC Q Purpose 1 לִבְנֹת — "to build"
3 InfC Q Purpose 2 וְלִנְטֹעַ — "and to plant"

Jer 18:10

Clause Type Domain Function Text
1 WQt0 (weqatal) Q Protasis (part A) וְעָשָׂה — "if it does"
2 AjCl Q Object of v. 10a הָרַע בְּעֵינַי — "the evil in my eyes"
3 InfC (with negative בִּלְתִּי) Q Protasis (part B) לְבִלְתִּי שְׁמֹעַ בְּקוֹלִי — "not to obey my voice"
4 WQt0 (weqatal) Q Apodosis וְנִחַמְתִּי עַל־הַטּוֹבָה — "then I will relent of the good"
5 xQt0 Q Relative modifier אֲשֶׁר אָמַרְתִּי לְהֵיטִיב אוֹתוֹ

Key Grammatical Features

1. רֶגַע אֲדַבֵּר — Temporal Accusative + 1cs Yiqtol (the "at-what-instant-I-speak" frame)

The opener is a bare noun in the adverbial accusative of time (רֶגַע, "[at] an instant, [at] any moment," Noun.ms.Abs) fronted before the 1cs Piel imperfect אֲדַבֵּר of דבר. The clause type xYq0 (non-clause-initial yiqtol) marks the noun as a topicalized temporal frame rather than the verb's subject or object.

  • Morphology of אֲדַבֵּר: Piel yiqtol 1cs. The Piel of דבר is the standard "speak" conjugation (cf. ehyeh-1cs-imperfect.md on the 1cs yiqtol in general).
  • Aspect: imperfective / non-past. KJV "at what instant I shall speak" (future) is defensible, but the yiqtol here is better read as gnomic/habitual-modal — "whenever I pronounce…" — setting up a general rule, not a single future speech-event.
  • רֶגַע as adverbial: The bare noun without prefixed bə- or lə- is the Hebrew idiom for "in an instant, momentarily, suddenly" (cf. Num 16:21, Exod 33:5, Isa 47:9, Jer 4:20). Here it modifies the act of speaking itself: YHWH at any moment can speak a verdict that is nevertheless conditional on subsequent response.
  • Fronted word order (xYq0): Topic-fronting of the temporal adverb places the conditionality-at-the-instant in the rhetorical spotlight — the speech-act itself is framed as revisable.

2. עַל־גּוֹי וְעַל־מַמְלָכָה — Indefinite Paired Complement

  • Both nouns are anarthrous (no definite article), generating an unrestricted any-nation / any-kingdom reading.
  • עַל with verbs of speech = "concerning, against, about" (BDB); in v. 7 the negative purpose-chain makes it adversarial ("against"), in v. 9 the positive purpose-chain makes it benefactive ("concerning/for").
  • Identical preposition in both oracles — the preposition does NOT encode direction; only the following purpose-chain does.

3. The Three-Verb Destruction Chain (v. 7) — לִנְתוֹשׁ וְלִנְתוֹץ וּלְהַאֲבִיד

Three parallel לְ + InfCon clauses expressing purpose/intent:

  • נתשׁ — Qal InfCon "to pluck up, uproot" (agricultural root-imagery)
  • נתץ — Qal InfCon "to tear down" (masonry-imagery — walls, altars)
  • אבד Hiphil — InfCon "to cause to perish / to destroy" (comprehensive-negative)

The three verbs together (plus "demolish" הרס and "afflict" הרע in the fuller Jer 1:10 list) form the Jeremianic destruction-vocabulary signature: they recur at Jer 1:10; 12:17; 18:7; 24:6; 31:28; 42:10; 45:4. Jer 1:10 and 31:28 pair them with the build/plant verbs of v. 9, making 18:7–10 the metalinguistic rule that governs Jeremiah's entire commissioning mandate.

4. The Two-Verb Construction Chain (v. 9) — לִבְנֹת וְלִנְטֹעַ

  • בנה — Qal InfCon "to build" (architectural-positive)
  • נטע — Qal InfCon "to plant" (agricultural-positive)

Only two verbs, against the three in v. 7. The asymmetry is stylistic, not theological: both chains are exhaustive of their domain.

5. וְשָׁב — Weqatal Qal Perfect 3ms of שׁוּב (the Protasis of v. 8)

A correction to note: the verb in v. 8 is NOT the Qal imperfect of שׁוּב (yāšûb) but the Qal perfect 3ms שָׁב preceded by conjunctive/consecutive waw (wə-šāb) — i.e., a weqatal, clause-type WQtX. This is load-bearing for the grammar of the conditional formula:

  • Weqatal in a conditional frame functions as a hypothetical future following on the yiqtol of v. 7. After a setup-yiqtol, a weqatal can carry the conditional protasis just as well as an explicit ʾim-clause (cf. syntax-conditional-vow.md; weqatal-apodosis-vow.md).
  • Syndetic (no אִם): The conditionality is carried entirely by the sequence v.7 yiqtol → v.8 weqatal, without a lexical conditional particle. This is an unmarked (particle-less) conditional — a well-attested Hebrew construction (GKC §159b; Gesenius-Kautzsch-Cowley p. 445 notes 2 Kgs 5:10 as a parallel where וְיָשֹׁב is apodosis to a suppressed protasis).
  • שׁוּב as covenantal-return verb: In Jeremiah שׁוּב + מִן + "evil" is the standard idiom for national repentance (Jer 15:7; 23:14; 23:22; 25:5; 26:3; 35:15; 36:3, 7). The Qal stem (not the Hiphil) puts the grammatical agency on the nation itself.
  • WQtX type (not WQt0) because the overt subject הַגּוֹי הַהוּא follows the verb. The demonstrative הַהוּא ("that [particular] nation") refers back anaphorically to the any-nation of v. 7.

User-supplied description note: the prompt called this "Qal imperfect of שׁוּב." The parser (ETCBC/BHSA tagging) identifies the form as Qal Perfect 3ms with conjunctive waw. The semantic function (hypothetical future / conditional protasis) is the same either way, but the morphology is weqatal, not yiqtol. This is representative of the broader pattern: the whole formula uses weqatal chains, not yiqtol chains, for the protasis-apodosis material.

6. וְעָשָׂה … לְבִלְתִּי שְׁמֹעַ — Weqatal + Negative Infinitive Construct (the Protasis of v. 10)

The mirror-protasis in v. 10 is structured identically, with expansion:

  • וְעָשָׂה — Qal weqatal 3ms of עשׂה, parallel to וְשָׁב of v. 8 (WQt0 clause-type, subject carried over from v. 9).
  • הָרַע בְּעֵינַי — "the evil in my eyes" (standard Deuteronomistic indictment formula, 2 Kgs 17:17; Jer 7:30; 32:30).
  • לְבִלְתִּי + InfCon — the negative infinitive-of-purpose construction. בִּלְתִּי (H1115) is a negator-particle that combines with לְ + InfCon to form "so as not to / in not" clauses (GKC §114s). Here it glosses the evil-action as constituted by disobedience — "doing evil in that it does not obey my voice."
  • The protasis is therefore bipartite (v. 10a weqatal + v. 10b neg-InfCon) where v. 8's protasis was monopartite (v. 8a weqatal alone).

7. וְנִחַמְתִּי — Weqatal Niphal Perfect 1cs of נחם (the Identical Apodosis in both v. 8 and v. 10)

This is the rhetorical hinge of the whole diptych — the SAME verb-form, morphologically identical to the last diacritic, heads both apodoses:

  • Morphology: Niphal perfect 1cs with conjunctive/consecutive waw. Clause type WQt0 (weqatal, no overt subject, since YHWH is the 1cs speaker throughout).
  • Niphal stem: The Niphal of נחם carries the semantic range "be sorry / relent / change one's mind / be moved to pity / console oneself" (cf. Gen 6:6–7, Exod 32:12–14, 1 Sam 15:11, 29, 35; Joel 2:13–14; Jon 3:9–10; 4:2; Amos 7:3, 6; Jer 4:28; 15:6; 18:8, 10; 20:16; 26:3, 13, 19; 42:10). The Niphal here is the reflexive/inner-change sense, not the passive "be comforted."
  • Weqatal after the protasis: Standard weqatal-apodosis pattern — cf. weqatal-apodosis-vow.md for the analogous construction in votive contexts (Jdg 11:31, Num 21:2, 1 Sam 1:11). The formal syntax is the same; only the speaker differs (vow = human speaker binding self; 18:7–10 = divine speaker framing contingency).
  • Direction-neutrality: This is the critical grammatical datum. Whether the announced oracle is disaster (v. 8) or benefit (v. 10), the reversal-verb is identical. The form does NOT encode which way the relenting goes; that is determined entirely by the object of the preposition עַל: עַל־הָרָעָה (v. 8, "concerning the disaster I had purposed") vs. עַל־הַטּוֹבָה (v. 10, "concerning the good I had said I would do").
  • Apparent tension with 1 Sam 15:29 / Num 23:19: 1 Sam 15:29 lōʾ yinnāḥēm kî lōʾ ʾādām hûʾ lə-hinnāḥēm ("he will not relent, for he is not a man that he should relent") uses the same Niphal root to deny that YHWH relents. The tension is grammatical-theological, not morphological: Jer 18 asserts YHWH's responsiveness-to-repentance (contingent); 1 Sam 15:29 denies YHWH's capriciousness-without-cause. Both use נחם Niphal.

8. אֲשֶׁר-Clauses as Performative-Speech Markers

Each apodosis ends with an אֲשֶׁר-clause that grounds the reality of the previously-announced oracle in YHWH's own prior speech-act:

  • v. 8: אֲשֶׁר דִּבַּרְתִּי עָלָיו ("which I had spoken against it") + אֲשֶׁר חָשַׁבְתִּי לַעֲשׂוֹת לוֹ ("which I had purposed to do to it")
  • v. 10: אֲשֶׁר אָמַרְתִּי לְהֵיטִיב אוֹתוֹ ("which I had said I would benefit it")

These are Qal/Piel qatal perfects (דבר Piel perf., חשׁב Qal perf., אמר Qal perf.) — encoding completed speech-acts that the אֲשֶׁר-clause now makes revisable. The very act of YHWH's speaking is marked as the thing to be unspoken under changed conditions.

9. Symmetrical Diptych — the Grammatical Mirror

Laying the two oracles side-by-side exposes the mirror:

Element v. 7–8 (judgment → mercy) v. 9–10 (promise → disaster)
Opener רֶגַע אֲדַבֵּר עַל־גּוֹי וְעַל־מַמְלָכָה וְרֶגַע אֲדַבֵּר עַל־גּוֹי וְעַל־מַמְלָכָה
Purpose-chain לִנְתוֹשׁ וְלִנְתוֹץ וּלְהַאֲבִיד (3×) לִבְנֹת וְלִנְטֹעַ (2×)
Protasis וְשָׁב הַגּוֹי הַהוּא מֵרָעָתוֹ וְעָשָׂה הָרַע בְּעֵינַי לְבִלְתִּי שְׁמֹעַ בְּקוֹלִי
Protasis verb Qal weqatal 3ms שׁוב Qal weqatal 3ms עשׂה (+ InfCon שׁמע)
Apodosis וְנִחַמְתִּי עַל־הָרָעָה וְנִחַמְתִּי עַל־הַטּוֹבָה
Apodosis verb Niphal weqatal 1cs נחם (identical) Niphal weqatal 1cs נחם (identical)
Object of reversal הָרָעָה (the disaster YHWH purposed) הַטּוֹבָה (the good YHWH purposed)
Prior-speech verb דִּבַּרְתִּי / חָשַׁבְתִּי אָמַרְתִּי

The formula is therefore formally bidirectional: mercy can reverse judgment, and evil can reverse promise, using the same verb in the same form for the divine relenting. The morphology enforces the theological claim that YHWH's sovereignty includes the freedom to revise prior oracles based on creaturely response.

10. Connection to the Potter-Parable (18:1–6)

The syntactic scaffolding of vv. 7–10 is the theological articulation of what v. 4 narrates: the potter who remakes a spoiled vessel is the hermeneutic key. The weqatal-chain שָׁב … וְנִחַמְתִּי ("turns back … and I relent") mirrors the potter's וְשָׁב וַיַּעֲשֵׂהוּ כְּלִי אַחֵר of v. 4. The verb שׁוב appears in both pericopes at the same structural hinge.

Comparative Inventory: נחם Niphal Weqatal 1cs in Prophetic-Conditional Contexts

From parser queries on the lemma נחם with Niphal stem and 1cs weqatal form, parallel passages include:

  • Jer 26:3 — וְנִחַמְתִּי אֶל־הָרָעָה (same form, same function, same rhetorical job)
  • Jer 26:13 — וְיִנָּחֵם יְהוָה (3ms Niphal yiqtol, applied to YHWH by the prophet)
  • Jer 42:10 — כִּי נִחַמְתִּי אֶל־הָרָעָה (Niphal perf. 1cs without waw; same reversal-logic)
  • Joel 2:13–14 — וְנִחַם עַל־הָרָעָה (Niphal perf. 3ms with waw; parent-text source)
  • Jon 3:9–10 — וְנִחַם הָאֱלֹהִים / וַיִּנָּחֶם הָאֱלֹהִים (Niphal perf/wayyiqtol 3ms)
  • Jon 4:2 — וְנִחָם עַל־הָרָעָה (Niphal perf. 3ms; Jonah quoting the formula)
  • Amos 7:3, 6 — נִחַם יְהוָה עַל־זֹאת (Niphal perf. 3ms, narrative)

The formula is therefore a stock prophetic-theological meme that Jer 18:7–10 abstracts into its rule-form.

Genre and Function

  • Genre: divine metalinguistic discourse (God speaking about how God speaks). Comparable to Num 23:19 / 1 Sam 15:29 (negative pole) and Ezek 18:21–32; 33:12–20 (individual analog of the national-level Jer 18 rule).
  • Function: hermeneutical key for reading every oracle of judgment or promise in the prophetic corpus. No threatened oracle is unconditional (Jonah-Nineveh); no promised oracle is unconditional either (Shiloh, Jer 7:12–15; Saul, 1 Sam 15). The conditionality is built into the grammar of prophetic speech itself.
  • Scope: the anarthrous עַל־גּוֹי וְעַל־מַמְלָכָה makes the rule apply universally — no nation is exempt, including Israel/Judah, which is its immediate rhetorical target in the Jeremianic context.

Cross-References

Summary

Jer 18:7–10 canonically establishes the conditional-prophecy formula as a grammatical rule: xYq0 opener (reḡaʿ ʾădabbēr) → InfCon purpose-chain (destruction or construction) → WQtX/WQt0 protasis (weqatal of שׁוב or עשׂה) → WQt0 apodosis (weqatal Niphal of נחם). The direction (judgment-to-mercy / promise-to-disaster) is encoded NOT in the verbs of the formula itself but in the purpose-chain of the opener and the object of עַל in the apodosis. The reversal-verb (wə-niḥamtî) is morphologically identical in both directions, making the formula a symmetrical diptych whose grammatical architecture enforces the theological claim that every divine oracle stands under the conditionality of creaturely response.

Generated from: hebrew_parser.py (--verse, --clause), semantic_grammar.py (Gesenius-Kautzsch-Cowley, Waltke-O'Connor), KJV text, ETCBC/BHSA clause-tagging Last updated: 2026-04-18