Skip to content

Reflexive-Object + ὅτι-Clause Display Construction (Greek)

Definition

A Greek syntactic pattern in which a verb of showing, claiming, or presenting takes a reflexive pronoun (ἑαυτόν / σεαυτόν) as its direct object, with the content of the display or claim expressed either by a ὅτι-clause, an infinitive clause, or a predicate accusative. The paradigm text is 2 Thessalonians 2:4:

ἀποδεικνύντα ἑαυτὸν ὅτι ἐστὶν Θεός "displaying himself (as the one) that he is God"

The structure has three slots:

  1. Display verb — ἀποδείκνυμι, δείκνυμι, ἐπιδείκνυμι, φαίνω, ὁμολογέω, ποιέω (with a "make-out-to-be" sense), λέγω (with εἶναι)
  2. Reflexive accusative — ἑαυτόν, σεαυτόν, ἐμαυτόν (object put on display by the subject)
  3. Content expression — ὅτι + finite clause, or accusative + infinitive, or bare predicate accusative

Critical semantic note: The construction reports what is claimed or displayed, not what is the case. A verb like ἀποδείκνυμι here denotes the public act of proof-exhibition; it does not validate the truth of the exhibited proposition. "He displays himself as X" is fully compatible with "he is not in fact X."

Form Recognition

Look for this cluster of morph tags in proximity:

  • Display verb: often V-PAP-ASM / V-PAI-3S / V-AAI-3S (ἀποδείκνυμι G584, δείκνυμι G1166, ποιέω G4160, λέγω G3004)
  • Reflexive pronoun: F-3ASM ἑαυτόν, F-2ASM σεαυτόν, F-1ASM ἐμαυτόν, F-3APM ἑαυτούς (Strong's G1438 / G4572 / G1683)
  • Content marker: either CONJ ὅτι (G3754), or V-PAN εἶναι + acc. complement, or a bare predicate accusative (N-ASM)

Parser search patterns: - greek_parser.py --lemma ἀποδείκνυμι / --lemma δείκνυμι / --lemma ἐπιδείκνυμι - Scan the verse hits for adjacent F-3ASM / F-2ASM reflexive + ὅτι or εἶναι

The Paradigm: 2 Thessalonians 2:4

Word Lemma Strong's Parsing Slot
ἀποδεικνύντα ἀποδείκνυμι G584 V-PAP-ASM display verb (Pres Act Ptcp)
ἑαυτὸν ἑαυτοῦ G1438 F-3ASM reflexive object
ὅτι ὅτι G3754 CONJ content-clause marker
ἔστιν εἰμί G1510 V-PAI-3S copula of content
Θεός θεός G2316 N-NSM predicate nominative of content

The participle ἀποδεικνύντα agrees with the accusative subject αὐτόν of the preceding ὥστε-clause. The reflexive ἑαυτόν is its direct object. The ὅτι-clause unpacks the content of the display. KJV glosses the whole "shewing himself that he is God"; most modern versions render the ὅτι-clause as a predicate expansion: "proclaiming himself to be God" (ESV), "declaring himself to be God" (NASB).

Variations of the Construction

1. Display verb + reflexive + ὅτι-clause (direct content)

Reference Greek Construction
2 Thess 2:4 ἀποδεικνύντα ἑαυτὸν ὅτι ἐστὶν Θεός ἀποδείκνυμι + ἑαυτόν + ὅτι
John 19:7* ὅτι Υἱὸν Θεοῦ ἑαυτὸν ἐποίησεν ποιέω + ἑαυτόν + predicate acc. (the ὅτι here is causal, not content)

*John 19:7 is a near-variant: the ὅτι is causal ("because he made himself Son of God"), but the internal clause itself uses the same reflexive + predicate-accusative display pattern (see §3 below).

2. Verb of saying + acc.-inf. with reflexive subject

Reference Greek Construction
Acts 5:36 λέγων εἶναί τινα ἑαυτόν λέγω + ἑαυτόν + εἶναι + pred. acc.
Acts 8:9 λέγων εἶναί τινα ἑαυτὸν μέγαν λέγω + ἑαυτόν + εἶναι + pred. acc.
Rev 2:9 τῶν λεγόντων Ἰουδαίους εἶναι ἑαυτούς λέγω + ἑαυτούς + εἶναι + pred. acc.
Rev 3:9 τῶν λεγόντων ἑαυτοὺς Ἰουδαίους εἶναι λέγω + ἑαυτούς + pred. acc. + εἶναι

Both Rev 2:9 and Rev 3:9 explicitly append καὶ οὐκ εἰσίν ("and they are not") — the narrator's own correction that confirms the claim-vs-reality gap inherent to the construction.

3. ποιέω + reflexive + predicate accusative ("make oneself out to be X")

Reference Greek KJV
John 8:53 τίνα σεαυτὸν ποιεῖς; "whom makest thou thyself?"
John 10:33 ποιεῖς σεαυτὸν Θεόν "makest thyself God"
John 19:7 Υἱὸν Θεοῦ ἑαυτὸν ἐποίησεν "he made himself the Son of God"

This idiom is distinctly Johannine in the NT for the charge of self-exaltation. The verb ποιέω here has the sense "claim, present, set forth as" (BDAG ποιέω §2.h).

4. Reflexive + voice-based display (middle/passive participle)

Reference Greek Parsing Sense
2 Cor 11:13 μετασχηματιζόμενοι εἰς ἀποστόλους Χριστοῦ V-PMP-NPM "transforming themselves into" (middle reflexive-force)

Here the reflexive is built into the middle voice rather than expressed as a separate pronoun; the construction is functionally parallel (self-presentation as X).

Grammatical Analysis

Why ὅτι and not an infinitive?

Classical and Koine Greek offer two standard options for reporting the content of a cognitive or declarative verb: - Accusative + infinitive — the older, more formal pattern - ὅτι-clause — the later, more explicit pattern that gained ground in Hellenistic Greek (BDF §§396–397)

2 Thess 2:4 chooses ὅτι. BDF §397(2) notes that ὅτι-clauses after verbs of demonstrating, showing, and declaring are an expansion of the older indirect-discourse pattern into Koine prose. The ὅτι-clause here is epexegetical to the reflexive ἑαυτόν: it specifies the content of what is being displayed about himself. Wallace (GGBB 458–459) classifies such ὅτι-clauses as "direct object" or "content" clauses.

Why the reflexive pronoun?

The reflexive accusative ἑαυτόν ensures that the display's object and the display's subject are the same referent — the subject exhibits himself, not a third party (Wallace 350–361 on reflexive pronouns; BDF §283). Without the reflexive, ἀποδεικνύντα αὐτόν could suggest another antecedent. With ἑαυτόν the self-directedness of the act is lexically guaranteed.

Claim vs. reality

The construction is semantically neutral on the truth-value of the content clause. Three NT texts make this explicit by refuting the claim within the same sentence:

  • Rev 2:9: λεγόντων Ἰουδαίους εἶναι ἑαυτούς, καὶ οὐκ εἰσίν
  • Rev 3:9: λεγόντων ἑαυτοὺς Ἰουδαίους εἶναι, καὶ οὐκ εἰσὶν ἀλλὰ ψεύδονται
  • 2 Cor 11:13: the pseudo-apostles transform themselves into (μετασχηματιζόμενοι εἰς) apostles of Christ — the label ψευδαπόστολοι in the same verse overturns the claim.

The grammar, therefore, asserts a public presentation and leaves open whether the content is veridical. A construction of the form "X displays/declares himself that he is Y" can stand alongside "X is not in fact Y" without contradiction.

Construction What it asserts Example
Reflexive-object + ὅτι-clause display X publicly presents himself as Y (truth-neutral) 2 Thess 2:4
Perfect passive of ἀποδείκνυμι + ἀπό + agent X has been demonstrated by Y (result-state, agent-attested) Acts 2:22 (Ἰησοῦν … ἀποδεδειγμένον ἀπὸ τοῦ Θεοῦ)
Copular predication εἰμί + nom. X is Y (assertion of state) John 1:1 (Θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος)
Indirect discourse with λέγω + ὅτι X says that … (report of speech) John 4:35

Acts 2:22 is a particularly instructive contrast: the same verb ἀποδείκνυμι appears as a perfect passive participle with ἀπὸ τοῦ Θεοῦ specifying divine agency — i.e., the attestation is ratified by God. In 2 Thess 2:4 there is no corresponding agent phrase; the subject is his own attestor, and the "proof" is self-issued.

Parallel Verbs in the Display Field

Tool-verified NT occurrences (from greek_parser.py --lemma):

Lemma Strong's Gloss NT count Notable forms
ἀποδείκνυμι G584 "show forth, demonstrate, exhibit" 4 V-PAP-ASM (2 Thess 2:4); V-RPP-ASM (Acts 2:22)
δείκνυμι G1166 "show, point out" 33 V-AAM-2S δεῖξον common (Matt 8:4; Luke 5:14)
ἐπιδείκνυμι G1925 "exhibit, display to someone" 7 V-PAP-NSM ἐπιδεικνύς (Acts 18:28)
φαίνω G5316 "shine, appear, be seen as" 31 V-PEI-3S φαίνεται (Matt 2:13); V-PPI-2P φαίνεσθε (Matt 23:28)
ὁμολογέω G3670 "confess, acknowledge, profess" 26 V-AAI-3S ὡμολόγησεν (Matt 14:7; John 1:20)
ποιέω (idiomatic) G4160 "make out to be, claim" V-PAI-2S ποιεῖς σεαυτόν (John 8:53; 10:33)

Each of these verbs can host a reflexive accusative and a content expression (ὅτι, εἶναι-inf., or predicate accusative), forming the same family of self-display constructions.

References

  • Wallace, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics 350–361 — reflexive pronouns; direct, intensive, and possessive uses of ἑαυτοῦ / σεαυτοῦ / ἐμαυτοῦ
  • BDF §283 — reflexive pronoun ἑαυτοῦ and its syntactic functions
  • BDF §396–397 — ὅτι-clauses after verbs of declaration, showing, demonstrating; competition with accusative-plus-infinitive

Generated from: greek_parser.py (--verse, --lemma); cross-checked against BDAG entries for ἀποδείκνυμι, ποιέω, λέγω Last updated: 2026-04-17