Skip to content

Study 11: Smoke Ascending Forever -- Advanced Study

Revelation 14:9-11 and 19:3 -- OT Source Imagery, Greek Vocabulary, and Genre Analysis

Evidence Tiers

This series uses a three-tier evidence classification to distinguish what Scripture says from what people claim it teaches:

  1. Explicit (E) -- The text directly says this. You can point to a verse and quote it.
  2. Necessary Implication (N) -- No single verse says this word-for-word, but it unavoidably follows from what the text does say. No interpretation is needed -- every reader, regardless of theological position, must agree.
  3. Inference (I) -- Someone claims the Bible teaches this, but no verse says it and no combination of verses forces it. Something must be added beyond what the text contains: a concept, a framework, or a choice between possible readings.

The hierarchy matters: Explicit > Necessary Implication > Inference. An inference cannot override what the text explicitly states.

Section A: The OT Fire-and-Brimstone Paradigm

  1. Trace the fire-and-brimstone paradigm across the OT. For each passage, identify the subject and the result:

    Passage Subject Result (what happens to the subject?)
    Genesis 19:24-25 Sodom and Gomorrah ___
    Deuteronomy 29:23 The land under God's curse ___
    Psalm 11:6 The wicked ___
    Isaiah 30:33 Tophet (prepared for the king) ___
    Isaiah 34:9-10 Edom ___
    Ezekiel 38:22 Gog's armies ___

    In any of these passages, does the fire-and-brimstone produce ongoing conscious torment? Or does it produce destruction and desolation in every verifiable case?

  2. The Hebrew word for brimstone is gophriyth (H1614). It occurs 7 times in the OT. Read Genesis 19:24, Deuteronomy 29:23, Job 18:15, Psalm 11:6, Isaiah 30:33, Isaiah 34:9, and Ezekiel 38:22. In how many of these occurrences does brimstone function as an agent of destructive judgment? In how many does it describe ongoing conscious torment?

  3. Read Luke 17:29. This is the only non-Revelation NT use of theion (G2303, brimstone). Jesus says fire and brimstone "destroyed them all." What does Jesus' own description of the fire-and-brimstone paradigm tell you about its meaning?

  4. Read Ezekiel 38:22 alongside Ezekiel 39:11-12. After the fire-and-brimstone judgment on Gog (38:22), what does Ezek 39:11-12 describe? What does seven months of burying corpses tell you about whether the brimstone judgment produces ongoing torment or death?

Section B: Isaiah 34 -- The Source Text for "Smoke Ascending Forever"

  1. Read Isaiah 34:9-10 carefully. The text uses multiple durational expressions: "not quenched night nor day," "the smoke thereof shall go up for ever," and "from generation to generation it shall lie waste; none shall pass through it for ever and ever." The last phrase uses the strongest available "forever" form in Hebrew (le-netsach netsachim). Now read Isaiah 34:11-17. After the strongest "forever" language in the OT, animals permanently inhabit the territory. What does this demonstrate about how the "forever fire/smoke" formula functions?

  2. Isaiah 34:9 uses gophriyth (brimstone) -- the same word as Genesis 19:24 (Sodom). What does this shared vocabulary tell you about the relationship between the Edom and Sodom judgment paradigms?

  3. Read Isaiah 1:31. "The strong shall be as tow, and the maker of it as a spark, and they shall both burn together, and none shall quench them." The phrase "none shall quench" parallels Isaiah 34:10 ("not quenched"). Tow (flax fiber) is fully consumed when burned. What does "unquenchable fire" describe -- a fire that never stops, or a fire that cannot be stopped until it finishes its work?

Section C: Greek Vocabulary in Revelation 14

  1. The Greek word basanismos (G929, "torment/torturing") occurs 6 times in the NT -- all in Revelation. Document each occurrence:

    Reference Subject Context
    Rev 9:5 ___ ___
    Rev 14:11 ___ ___
    Rev 18:7 ___ ___
    Rev 18:10 ___ ___
    Rev 18:15 ___ ___

    How many of the 6 occurrences describe Babylon's "torment"? What IS Babylon's torment -- is she still being tormented, or was she utterly destroyed (Rev 18:8,21)?

  2. Rev 9:5 uses basanismos with an explicit time limit of five months. What does this tell you about whether basanismos inherently means "eternal"?

  3. The verb basanizo (G928, "to torment/test") has a wide semantic range. Document the following non-judgment uses:

    Reference Subject Meaning
    Matthew 8:6 ___ ___
    Matthew 14:24 ___ ___
    Mark 6:48 ___ ___
    2 Peter 2:8 ___ ___
    Revelation 12:2 ___ ___

    Does the word inherently mean "eternal conscious suffering," or does it describe various forms of distress, testing, and difficulty?

  4. The Greek word anapausis (G372, "rest/cessation") appears in both Rev 14:11 ("they have no rest day nor night") and Rev 4:8 ("they rest not day and night"). Same word, same book, same author. In Rev 4:8, the living creatures' unceasing praise is described with the same "no rest day and night" formula. What does the Rev 4:8 usage demonstrate about whether "no rest day and night" describes eternal duration or the continuous quality of an activity during its execution?

  5. Read Revelation 14:13, two verses after 14:11. The faithful dead "rest" (anapauomai, a cognate of anapausis) from their labors. What does the juxtaposition of "no rest" for beast-worshippers (14:11) and "rest" for the faithful dead (14:13) suggest about the literary structure of this passage?

Section D: Genre Gate Analysis -- Apocalyptic Vision

  1. Read Revelation 1:1. The word semaino (G4591) means "to signify, to communicate through signs." Nave's Topical Bible classifies the entire book of Revelation under VISION, and Rev 14:8-13 is specifically listed under VISION. What are the implications for reading Rev 14:10-11 as a literal didactic statement about human destiny?

  2. Rev 14:10 describes the torment occurring "in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb." The Greek enopion ("in the presence of / before") is a judgment/throne-room word throughout Revelation (4:5-6; 7:9; 8:2-4; 20:12). Does this suggest a permanent state or a judgment event?

  3. The "eis tous aionas ton aionon" ("for ever and ever" / "unto the ages of the ages") formula is used approximately 19 times for God and Christ in doxological contexts and 3 times in judgment contexts (Rev 14:11; 19:3; 20:10). When the same formula is applied to Babylon's smoke in Rev 19:3 -- a symbolic entity already described as utterly destroyed -- what does this tell you about whether the formula requires literal infinite duration in every context?

Section E: Cross-Referencing Rev 14 with OT Judgment Imagery

  1. Read Psalm 37:20. "The wicked shall perish, and the enemies of the LORD shall be as the fat of lambs: they shall consume; into smoke shall they consume away." What is smoke in this OT passage -- evidence of ongoing existence, or the end product of consumption?

  2. Read Hosea 13:3. Smoke is listed alongside morning cloud, early dew, and chaff as images of transience -- things that disappear. Now read Isaiah 51:6: "the heavens shall vanish away like smoke." What does the OT smoke vocabulary consistently represent -- permanence or vanishing?

  3. Read Ezekiel 28:18-19. Fire "shall devour thee" and produce "ashes upon the earth"; the subject is "never shalt thou be any more." What is the relationship between fire, ashes, and the final state described?

  4. Read Nahum 1:8-10. "He will make an utter end" and the enemies are "devoured as stubble fully dry." How does this fire-judgment passage describe the result -- as ongoing torment or as complete cessation?

  5. Read Psalm 11:6 alongside Revelation 14:10. Psalm 11:6 says "fire and brimstone, and an horrible tempest: this shall be the portion of their cup." Rev 14:10 says "the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation." What OT imagery does Rev 14:10's "cup" language draw from, and what do OT judgment-cup passages describe -- an eternal state or a finite act of judgment?

Section F: Rev 20:9-10 -- Different Subjects, Different Vocabulary

  1. Read Revelation 20:9-10 carefully. Verse 9 describes human enemies; verse 10 describes the devil, beast, and false prophet. Fill in the comparison:

    Rev 20:9 (humans) Rev 20:10 (devil, beast, false prophet)
    Subjects ___ ___
    Verb ___ ___
    Duration ___ ___
    Subject type Human ___

    The text uses different vocabulary for different subjects in adjacent verses. What does this distinction suggest?

  2. The beast and false prophet in Rev 20:10 are symbolic entities (the beast represents a political/religious system, not a literal animal). What are the implications of applying the fate of symbolic entities to literal human beings?

Section G: Evidence Classification Exercise

Classify each claim below as Explicit (E), Necessary Implication (N), or Inference (I). For each inference, identify what must be added beyond what the text says.

  1. "Isaiah 34:10 uses the identical 'smoke ascending for ever' and 'not quenched night nor day' formula found in Revelation 14:11, and Isaiah 34:11-17 describes animals inhabiting the desolated ruins."
  2. Classification: ___

  3. If inference, what is added: ___

  4. "The 'smoke ascending for ever' formula in its OT source (Isa 34:10) describes permanent desolation, not ongoing combustion, because animals dwell in the ruins (Isa 34:11-17)."

  5. Classification: ___

  6. If inference, what is added: ___

  7. "Revelation 14:10-11 teaches that all the wicked will experience ongoing, conscious, eternal torment in the afterlife."

  8. Classification: ___

  9. If inference, what is added: ___

  10. "Basanismos (G929) describes Babylon's completed destruction in 3 of its 6 NT occurrences."

  11. Classification: ___

  12. If inference, what is added: ___

  13. "Because basanismos is used for Babylon's completed destruction in same-book context, it does not require 'eternal conscious suffering' as its meaning."

  14. Classification: ___

  15. If inference, what is added: ___

  16. "The fate described for the devil, beast, and false prophet in Rev 20:10 applies equally to all unsaved humans."

  17. Classification: ___

  18. If inference, what is added: ___

  19. "When humans enter the lake of fire (Rev 20:14-15; 21:8), the identifying term is 'second death.'"

  20. Classification: ___
  21. If inference, what is added: ___

Section H: What CAN Be Said / What CANNOT Be Said

Based on your study, fill in each column:

What CAN be said (the Bible explicitly states or necessarily implies):

What CANNOT be said (not stated or necessarily implied -- requires adding something):