Skip to content

Study 10: Souls Under the Altar -- Advanced Study

Revelation 6:9-11 -- Apocalyptic Vision, Sacrificial Imagery, and the State of the Dead

Evidence Tiers

This series uses a three-tier evidence classification to distinguish what Scripture says from what people claim it teaches:

  1. Explicit (E) -- The text directly says this. You can point to a verse and quote it.
  2. Necessary Implication (N) -- No single verse says this word-for-word, but it unavoidably follows from what the text does say. No interpretation is needed -- every reader, regardless of theological position, must agree.
  3. Inference (I) -- Someone claims the Bible teaches this, but no verse says it and no combination of verses forces it. Something must be added beyond what the text contains: a concept, a framework, or a choice between possible readings.

The hierarchy matters: Explicit > Necessary Implication > Inference. An inference cannot override what the text explicitly states.

Section A: Word Studies -- Sphazō, Psychē, Anapauō

  1. Sphazō (G4969, "to slaughter/slay") occurs only 8 times in the entire NT: Rev 5:6,9,12 (the Lamb); Rev 6:4 (general killing); Rev 6:9 (the martyrs); Rev 13:3 (the beast, parodying the Lamb); Rev 18:24 (all slain on earth); 1 Jn 3:12 (Abel). The word is a sacrificial/butchering term. Chart all 8 uses. What framework emerges from the concentrated use of sphazō for the Lamb, the martyrs, and Abel?

  2. Psychē (G5590) is used multiple ways in Revelation. Examine the following uses:

  3. Rev 6:9 -- "souls [psychas] of them that were slain"
  4. Rev 8:9 -- sea creatures that "had life [psychēn], died"
  5. Rev 12:11 -- the martyrs "loved not their lives [psychas] unto the death"
  6. Rev 16:3 -- "every living soul [psychē] died" (sea creatures)
  7. Rev 20:4 -- "the souls [psychas] of them that were beheaded"

Does psychē in Revelation exclusively mean "disembodied conscious spirit"? What range of meaning does the word carry in this book?

  1. The OT establishes that nephesh (the Hebrew equivalent of psychē) is in the blood: "The life [nephesh] of the flesh is in the blood" (Lev 17:11); "the blood is the life [nephesh]" (Deut 12:23); "the life [nephesh] of all flesh is the blood thereof" (Lev 17:14). If psychē = nephesh = blood = life, what does "souls [psychas] under the altar" correspond to in OT sacrificial practice?

  2. Anapauō (G373, "to rest") is used in Rev 6:11 (martyrs told to rest) and Rev 14:13 (the blessed dead rest from labors). The Hebrew equivalent nuach appears in Dan 12:13 (Daniel will rest, then stand at the end). Compare the three passages. Is the "rest" in each a period of conscious activity, or a period of waiting that ends at resurrection?

Section B: Genre and Subject Gate Analysis (Tree 3)

  1. Rev 1:1 uses the verb sēmainō (from sēma, "a sign") to describe how the book communicates. Nave's Topical Bible classifies the entirety of Revelation under VISION. When Tree 3's Gate 3 (Genre Gate) asks whether the passage is apocalyptic vision literature, what is the answer for Rev 6:9-11?

  2. The fourth seal (Rev 6:8) personifies Death (Thanatos) and Hades as horsemen riding a pale horse. Tree 3's Gate 1 (Subject Gate) asks whether the subjects are literal human beings or symbolic vision-figures. When the immediately preceding passage personifies abstract concepts as riders, what does this indicate about the "souls under the altar" as subjects?

  3. In Rev 16:7, John hears "another out of the altar say, Even so, Lord God Almighty, true and righteous are thy judgments." The altar itself speaks. If the altar can speak in this book, does the speech of the souls under the altar require literal consciousness, or does it fit the same personification pattern?

  4. Apply Tree 3 to Rev 6:9-11:

  5. Step 1 (Vocabulary Scan): Does "cried with a loud voice" (Rev 6:10) register as V2 (conscious activity vocabulary)?
  6. Step 2, Gate 1 (Subject Gate): Are the subjects literal human beings or symbolic vision-figures in an apocalyptic vision?
  7. Step 2, Gate 3 (Genre Gate): Is the genre didactic teaching or apocalyptic vision?
  8. Step 3 (Reclassification): If any gate fails, what is the corrected classification?

Section C: The OT Sacrificial Altar Background

  1. Document the blood-at-the-altar-base legislation. In how many passages does the Torah specify that sacrificial blood is poured at the bottom of the altar (Lev 4:7, 18, 25, 30, 34; Exo 29:12)? What is the spatial relationship between the blood and the altar in every case?

  2. The Greek word hypokatō ("under, beneath") in Rev 6:9 places the psychas beneath the altar. Compare this spatial arrangement with the OT blood-at-the-altar-base pattern. Is the correspondence incidental, or does the OT sacrificial background explain why John sees psychas (blood-lives) under the altar?

  3. Read Revelation 18:24: "In her was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain [sphazō] upon the earth." The same sphazō used for the martyrs in Rev 6:9 appears here. The blood is found "in" Babylon. Does this passage describe conscious souls inside Babylon, or blood-guilt?

Section D: The Abel-to-Martyrs Arc

  1. Trace the Abel-blood-crying motif across Scripture:

    • Gen 4:10 -- Abel's blood cries from the ground
    • Heb 11:4 -- Abel, dead, yet speaks through sacrifice
    • Heb 12:24 -- Christ's blood speaks better things than Abel's
    • Matt 23:35 -- "all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel"
    • Luke 11:50-51 -- "the blood of all the prophets... from the blood of Abel"
    • 1 Jn 3:12 -- Cain "slew [sphazō] his brother"
    • Rev 6:9-10 -- the psychas of the slain [sphazō] cry for vindication
    • Rev 17:6 -- Babylon drunk with the blood of the saints and martyrs
    • Rev 18:24 -- in Babylon found the blood of all slain [sphazō] on earth
    • Rev 19:2 -- God "hath avenged [ekdikeō] the blood of his servants"

    What narrative arc does this trace? Does the cry of Rev 6:10 function as a literal description of consciousness, or as a prophetic-narrative device driving Revelation's judgment sequence?

  2. Jesus says "all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias" (Matt 23:35). He connects Abel's blood to the prophets' blood to hold the persecutors accountable. Does Jesus treat Abel's crying blood as evidence that Abel was conscious, or as a forensic demand for justice against the guilty?

  3. The cry of Rev 6:10 ("How long... dost thou not judge and avenge [ekdikeō] our blood?") is answered in Rev 19:2 ("hath avenged [ekdikeō] the blood of his servants at her hand"). The same word (ekdikeō) bookends the narrative arc. This arc is rooted in Deut 32:43 ("he will avenge the blood of his servants"). Between Rev 6:10 and Rev 19:2, what events occur: Rev 16:6 (blood-for-blood judgment), Rev 16:7 (altar affirms judgment), Rev 17:6 (Babylon drunk with blood), Rev 18:24 (blood of all slain found in Babylon)? Does this sequence function as a description of the intermediate state, or as a literary arc of vindication?

Section E: The Rev 20:4-5 Connection and the Rest-Then-Resurrection Pattern

  1. Compare the vocabulary of Rev 6:9 and Rev 20:4 side by side:

    • Rev 6:9: psychas... esphagmenōn... dia ton logon tou Theou... kai dia tēn martyrian
    • Rev 20:4: psychas... pepelekismenōn dia tēn martyrian Iēsou kai dia ton logon tou Theou

    Both passages use psychas, martyria, and logos tou Theou. Is there sufficient vocabulary overlap to identify these as the same group?

  2. Rev 20:4-5 states: "they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. This is the first resurrection." If the martyrs' transition to "living" is identified as the first resurrection, what was their condition before the first resurrection? Were they "living" in an intermediate state?

  3. Rev 20:5a: "The rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished." The phrase "lived not" (ouk ezesan) applies to the dead before their resurrection. If the martyrs of Rev 6:9 = the martyrs of Rev 20:4, and their "living" occurs at the first resurrection, then their condition between death and resurrection is "lived not." Does this match or contradict the claim that they are consciously alive under the altar?

  4. The anapauō (rest) command in Rev 6:11, the anapauō description of the blessed dead in Rev 14:13, and the nuach (rest) command to Daniel in Dan 12:13 all share the same pattern: rest now, resurrection later. Document the three-passage pattern. Is there any passage in this chain that identifies "rest" as conscious activity?

Section F: Counter-Arguments and the SIS Hierarchy

  1. An ECT defender might argue: "The text says the souls cried with a loud voice -- this proves they are conscious." Evaluate this claim in light of: (a) Gen 4:10 (Abel's blood cried); (b) Jas 5:4 (wages cried); (c) Rev 16:7 (the altar spoke); (d) Rev 6:8 (Death and Hades ride horses). Does "crying" in apocalyptic vision literature prove literal consciousness?

  2. An ECT defender might argue: "The white robes prove the dead receive conscious rewards." Evaluate this claim in light of the symbolic nature of Revelation: the Lamb has seven horns and seven eyes (Rev 5:6); Babylon is a woman in purple and scarlet (Rev 17:4); the dragon has seven heads (Rev 12:3). Do symbolic entities receiving symbolic items in an apocalyptic vision constitute evidence of literal conscious activity?

  3. An ECT defender might argue: "Even if Revelation uses symbols, symbols must refer to something real -- so the souls under the altar must refer to real conscious dead people." Evaluate this claim. Do all symbols in Revelation refer to the literal version of their imagery? Does the symbol of Death riding a horse mean Death literally rides a horse? Does the symbol of a seven-headed dragon mean a literal seven-headed dragon exists?

  4. At least eight OT authors across six or more books describe the dead as unconscious: Ecc 9:5 (know nothing); Ps 146:4 (thoughts perish); Ps 115:17 (dead praise not the LORD, go down into silence); Ps 6:5 (no remembrance in death); Ecc 9:10 (no work, knowledge, wisdom in the grave); Job 14:12 (rise not till heavens be no more); Job 14:21 (dead man knows not his sons' honor); Isa 38:18-19 (grave cannot praise). These are all didactic passages. Rev 6:9-11 is an apocalyptic vision. The SIS (Scripture Interprets Scripture) clarity criteria rank didactic above apocalyptic on all five measures (directness, genre, scope, frequency, self-interpretation). Can an apocalyptic vision override multiple didactic statements from multiple authors?

Section G: Evidence Classification Exercise

Classify each claim below as Explicit (E), Necessary Implication (N), or Inference (I). For each inference, identify what must be added beyond what the text says.

  1. "In an apocalyptic vision, John sees psychas under the altar -- those slain (sphazō) for the word of God and for their testimony."
  2. Classification: ___

  3. If inference, what is added: ___

  4. "Psyche/nephesh = blood = life (Lev 17:11,14; Gen 9:4; Deut 12:23)."

  5. Classification: ___

  6. If inference, what is added: ___

  7. "The psychas under the altar correspond to sacrificial blood at the altar base, following the OT pattern."

  8. Classification: ___

  9. If inference, what is added: ___

  10. "Rev 6:9-11 teaches that the dead are consciously present in heaven, aware of earthly events, and communicating with God."

  11. Classification: ___

  12. If inference, what is added: ___

  13. "The sphazō vocabulary chain links the Lamb (Rev 5:6,9,12), the martyrs (Rev 6:9; 18:24), and Abel (1 Jn 3:12) in a shared sacrificial framework."

  14. Classification: ___

  15. If inference, what is added: ___

  16. "The white robes prove the dead receive rewards before the resurrection."

  17. Classification: ___

  18. If inference, what is added: ___

  19. "The same group appears in Rev 20:4-5 and 'lived' at the first resurrection."

  20. Classification: ___
  21. If inference, what is added: ___

Section H: What CAN Be Said / What CANNOT Be Said

Based on your study, fill in each column:

What CAN be said (the Bible explicitly states or necessarily implies):

What CANNOT be said (not stated or necessarily implied -- requires adding something):