Skip to content

Raw Data: Web Research — Historical Witnesses and Scholarly Sources

Thomas Newton (1704-1782)

  • Dissertations on the Prophecies, Which Have Remarkably Been Fulfilled, and at This Time Are Fulfilling in the World
  • Published: London, first edition 1754; ran through multiple editions (available: 1825 ed.)
  • Available on Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/ThomasNewtonDissertationsOnThePropheciesWhichHaveRemarkablyBeen
  • Newton was Bishop of Bristol; his work is a major historicist treatment of Daniel and Revelation
  • Addressed the connection between Daniel's prophecies and their historical fulfillment
  • Contemporary Isaac Newton (separate author) also addressed Daniel's prophecies in Observations upon the Prophecies of Daniel and the Apocalypse of St. John (1733)

Albert Barnes (1798-1870)

  • Notes on Daniel (1853), part of Barnes' Notes on the Old and New Testaments
  • Barnes' commentary on Daniel 8:14 notes the Hebrew reads "evening, morning" (ereb boqer)
  • References the Genesis 1 creation-day pattern for "evening and the morning"
  • Barnes concludes "a day is intended by this, for this is the fair and obvious interpretation"
  • Note: Barnes actually takes the preterist position on the 2300 days, relating them to Antiochus Epiphanes — approximately 6 years and 4 months. However, his grammatical analysis of the evening-morning construct supports the day-unit reading (not half-days).
  • Available at: https://www.studylight.org/commentary/daniel/8-14.html

H. Grattan Guinness (1835-1910)

  • The Approaching End of the Age: Viewed in the Light of History, Prophecy and Science (1878)
  • Irish Protestant Christian preacher, evangelist and author
  • Preached during the Ulster Revival of 1859
  • The book defends the historicist understanding of prophecy, particularly Daniel and Revelation
  • Defends the premillennial return of Christ
  • Extensive timeline analysis of biblical prophecy, particularly the Book of Daniel
  • Applies the year-day principle to Daniel's time prophecies
  • Available on Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/approachingendof00guin_1

E.B. Elliott (1793-1875)

  • Horae Apocalypticae; or, A Commentary on the Apocalypse, Critical and Historical; Including Also An Examination of the Chief Prophecies of Daniel
  • Published: 5 editions (1844, 1846, 1847, 1851, 1862)
  • 2,500 pages with ~10,000 references to ancient and modern works
  • "Doubtless the most elaborate work ever produced on the Apocalypse" (contemporary assessment)
  • Charles Spurgeon wrote in 1876 that it was "the standard work on the subject"
  • Defends the historicist school of interpretation against futurist attacks
  • Includes examination of Daniel's chief prophecies including the year-day principle
  • Cited Primasius in vol. III, p. 280 (5th ed., 1862) regarding the day-year principle
  • Available on Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/horaeapocalyptic02elli

John J. Collins

  • Daniel: A Commentary on the Book of Daniel (Hermeneia series, 1993)
  • Most comprehensive English-language commentary on Daniel in 65 years at time of publication
  • Critical/preterist position: dates Daniel's composition to the Maccabean period
  • Interprets Daniel's prophecies in relation to Antiochus IV Epiphanes
  • Treats the 2300 days as literal days referring to the period of temple desecration (~167-164 BC)
  • Does not connect Daniel 9 organically to Daniel 8
  • ISBN: 9780800660406

John E. Goldingay

  • Daniel (Word Biblical Commentary, 1989)
  • Another major critical commentary treating Daniel in its ANE context
  • Generally follows the preterist/Maccabean interpretation framework

Parker and Dubberstein

  • Babylonian Chronology: 626 B.C.–A.D. 75 (1956)
  • Richard A. Parker and Waldo H. Dubberstein, Oriental Institute, University of Chicago
  • The standard reference for ancient Near Eastern chronology based on cuneiform tablets
  • Method: gathering dated tablets from ancient Near Eastern kings to establish transition points between reigns
  • Key datum: Page 32 pegs the seventh year of Artaxerxes I as beginning Nisan 1, 458 BC (Julian date April 8)
  • The spring-to-spring vs. fall-to-fall reckoning issue:
  • Babylonian/Persian calendar (spring-to-spring): 7th year = spring 458 to spring 457 BC
  • Jewish fall-to-fall reckoning: 7th year = fall 458 to fall 457 BC
  • Ezra's journey: left Babylon 1st day of 1st month, arrived Jerusalem 1st day of 5th month (Ezra 7:9)
  • This falls in 457 BC under the Jewish fall-to-fall calendar
  • Available: https://isac.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/docs/saoc24.pdf
  • Also available on Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/babylonianchrono0000park

Chathak (H2852) Scholarly Discussion

  • Hapax legomenon in Biblical Hebrew — only occurrence Daniel 9:24
  • Scholarly debate between "determined" and "cut off" meanings
  • Historical readings from the early church favored "cut off"
  • Contemporary academic translations often lean toward "determined"
  • The root can mean "cut off" with derived uses of "divided," "shortened," "abridged"
  • KJV translates as "are determined" — obscuring the cutting metaphor
  • Academic discussion: Hanganu, "The Meaning of chathak in Daniel 9:24" (with reply from other scholars)
  • Available at: https://www.academia.edu/10523914/
  • Gesenius-Kautzsch-Cowley, 28th edition, 1910
  • GKC p. 97 discusses the semantic field of cutting words:
  • קצץ and קצה = "to cut, to cut off" — also metaphorically "to decide, to judge"
  • קצב = "to cut off, to shear"
  • This family of cutting-words → deciding/judging shows the Hebrew metaphorical pattern: cutting → decreeing
  • Chathak belongs to this same semantic field: cutting → determining