Prior Study Summaries

dan3-31-HIST-framework

HIST as complete system: three principles (sequential kingdoms, continuous fulfillment, day-year), christological center (70 weeks + Dan 8:14 + Dan 12), progressive revelation across four vision cycles, theodicy narrative. 38 I-A / 0 I-D / 0 constraints. Weaknesses all MODERATE history-mapping.

dan3-32-PRET-framework

PRET as complete system: single axiom (Maccabean scope cap). Generates all strengths (Dan 8 specification matches, Dan 11:2-35 precision) and all weaknesses (three FATAL: Dan 11:40-45, Dan 12:2, Dan 12:13). ~20+ constraints from ALL items. 0/15 counter-argument scorecard. Two internal contradictions.

dan3-33-FUT-framework

FUT as complete system: two-tier architecture (text-derived foundation shared with HIST + dispensational superstructure at I-C LOW). Dependency chain from Israel/Church distinction through gap, Antichrist, Third Temple, tribulation, rapture. When distinctive framework removed, collapses into HIST subset. 4 I-D overrides.

dan3-30-grand-synthesis

399 evidence items. 273 E/N (68%) all position-neutral. HIST: 38 I-A, 0 I-D, 0 constraints, avg depth 1.5. PRET: 33 I-A, 1 I-D, ~20+ constraints, avg depth 2.1. FUT: 22 I-A, 4 I-D, ~10+ constraints, avg depth 2.4.

dan3-24-nt-use-of-daniel

Three NT authors treat Dan 7-12 as unified prophetic corpus. Verbatim quotations, vocabulary chains, already/not yet framework. Adversary identification = inference-level.

dan3-25-daniel-revelation

Pervasive literary dependence. Verbatim quotation chains. Counterfeit architecture. Sealed-to-unsealed arc. Christological merger. Composite beast absorbs all four Dan 7 beasts.

hist-09-why-not-preterism-futurism-idealism

Arguments against non-historicist positions. Direct precursor for framework comparison.

hist-01-how-to-read-apocalyptic-prophecy

Hermeneutical principles from Scripture itself for reading apocalyptic prophecy.