Skip to content

Custom Instructions — dan3-34 Framework Comparison

Reference Boundary

  • Scripture is the only authority for doctrine
  • Dan3 series evidence (dan3-00 through dan3-33) is the data source for framework analysis
  • Do NOT rehash individual evidence items — compare at the framework/system level

Required Reading

The analysis agent MUST read these prior study CONCLUSIONs before writing: - dan3-31-HIST-framework/CONCLUSION.md (HIST as a system) - dan3-32-PRET-framework/CONCLUSION.md (PRET as a system) - dan3-33-FUT-framework/CONCLUSION.md (FUT as a system) - dan3-30-grand-synthesis/CONCLUSION.md (the evidence tallies) - dan3-24-nt-use-of-daniel/CONCLUSION.md (how NT authors treat Daniel) - dan3-25-daniel-revelation/CONCLUSION.md (Daniel-Revelation connections)

Focus

This is a FRAMEWORK COMPARISON study. The question is: how do the three interpretive systems compare STRUCTURALLY — not counting items, but comparing: 1. What each position assumes about how apocalyptic prophecy works 2. What narrative each position tells 3. How much text each framework accounts for with text-derived vs imported inferences 4. Where Christ is in each reading 5. How each integrates with NT authors' actual use of Daniel 6. What would falsify each framework 7. Why the evidence asymmetry (0 constraints vs ~20+ vs ~10+) exists at the framework level 8. What each framework contributes that the others should acknowledge

Series Context

This is dan3-34 in a 35-study series. Dan3-31/32/33 analyzed each framework individually. This study compares them side by side.