Skip to content

Custom Instructions — dan3-33 FUT Framework

Reference Boundary

  • Scripture is the only authority for doctrine
  • Dan3 series evidence (dan3-00 through dan3-30) is the data source for framework analysis
  • Do NOT rehash individual evidence items — synthesize at the framework/system level

Required Reading

The analysis agent MUST read these prior study CONCLUSIONs before writing: - dan3-29-FUT-steelman/CONCLUSION.md (the complete FUT case) - dan3-30-grand-synthesis/CONCLUSION.md (the grand synthesis with all tallies) - dan3-06-COMPARE-daniel-2/CONCLUSION.md (Dan 2 comparison) - dan3-10-COMPARE-daniel-7/CONCLUSION.md (Dan 7 comparison) - dan3-14-COMPARE-daniel-8/CONCLUSION.md (Dan 8 comparison) - dan3-18-COMPARE-daniel-8-9/CONCLUSION.md (Dan 8-9 comparison) - dan3-22-COMPARE-daniel-10-12/CONCLUSION.md (Dan 10-12 comparison) - dan3-26-counter-arguments/CONCLUSION.md (counter-arguments)

Focus

This is a FRAMEWORK study. The question is: what is futurism/dispensationalism as a SYSTEM — the hermeneutical logic, the narrative arc, and why its distinctive claims are uniformly I-C LOW? Why do FUT's strongest items overlap with HIST? What does the 4 I-D + 4 I-C profile tell us about the framework itself? What does FUT get right that other positions should acknowledge?

Series Context

This is dan3-33 in a 35-study series. The prior 31 studies classified 399 evidence items across three positions. This study zooms out from details to framework.