Skip to content

Topics Research

Question

How does dispensationalist futurism read Daniel 10-12, and what is the basis for placing the break at 11:36?

Topics

ANTICHRIST

Full Entry: - General scriptures concerning: MAT 24:5,23,24,26; MRK 13:6,21,22; LUK 21:8; 2TH 2:3-12; 1JN 2:18,22; 4:3; 2JN 1:7 - To be destroyed: REV 19:20; 20:10,15

Relevance to study: FUT identifies the willful king of Dan 11:36 as the future Antichrist. The Nave's entry links Antichrist directly to 2 Thess 2:3-12 (man of sin), which FUT reads as a composite of Daniel's four Antichrist portraits. The destruction texts (Rev 19:20; 20:10,15) correlate with Dan 11:45 ("he shall come to his end, and none shall help him").

RESURRECTION

Full Entry: - General scriptures: JOB 14:12-15; 19:25-27; PSA 16:9,10; 17:15; 49:15; ISA 25:8; 26:19; EZK 37:1-14; DAN 12:2,3,13; HOS 13:14; MAT 22:23-32; 24:31; 25:1-13; 27:52,53; MRK 12:18-27; LUK 14:14; 20:27-38; JHN 5:21,25,28,29; 6:39,40,44,54; 11:23-25; 14:19; ACT 2:26-31; 4:1,2; 17:18,32; 23:6,8; 24:14,15; 26:6-8; ROM 4:16-21; 8:10,11,19,21-23; 1CO 6:14; 15:12-32,35-57; 2CO 4:14; 5:1-5; PHP 3:10,11,21; 1TH 4:14,16; 2TI 1:10; 2:18; HEB 6:2; 11:19,35; REV 1:18; 20:4-6,13 - Figurative (regeneration): ROM 6:4; EPH 2:1,5,6; COL 2:12; 3:1 - Typified: Isaac (GEN 22:13 / HEB 11:19); Jonah (JON 2:10 / MAT 12:40) - Symbolical: REV 11:11

Relevance to study: Dan 12:2 is listed as a primary resurrection text. FUT maps the two groups of Dan 12:2 onto Rev 20:4-6 (first resurrection of tribulation martyrs) and Rev 20:11-13 (second resurrection at the Great White Throne). The partitive construction rabbim mi-yeshene ("many FROM the sleepers") supports FUT's two-stage premillennial resurrection scheme.

MICHAEL

Full Entry: - 10. The Archangel - His message to Daniel: DAN 10:13,21; 12:1 - Contention with the devil: Jude 1:9 - Fights with the dragon: REV 12:7

Relevance to study: FUT typically reads Michael as a created archangel (not Christ). The texts DAN 10:13 ("one of the chief princes" — partitive construction echad ha-sarim ha-rishonim) and Jude 1:9 (Michael "durst not bring against him a railing accusation") are cited as evidence Michael is a created being operating under divine authority, not Christ himself.

ARCHANGEL

Full Entry: - General scriptures: 1TH 4:16; Jude 1:9

Relevance to study: 1 Thess 4:16 links the archangel's voice to the resurrection — key for FUT's eschatological framework. Jude 1:9 identifies Michael as THE archangel.

ANGEL (Holy Trinity)

Full Entry: - ONE OF THE HOLY TRINITY - Called ANGEL OF GOD: EXO 14:19; JDG 13:6; 1SA 29:9; 2SA 14:17,20; 19:27; ACT 27:23; GAL 4:14 - Called ANGEL OF THE LORD: GEN 16:7,9; 22:11; EXO 3:2; NUM 22:23,25,27,32,35; JDG 2:1; 6:11,12,21,22; 13:3,6,9,13-21; 2SA 24:16; 1KI 19:7; 2KI 1:3,15; 19:35; 1CH 21:15,18; PSA 34:7; 35:5,6; ZEC 1:11,12; 3:5; 12:8 - Called ANGEL OF HIS PRESENCE: ISA 63:9

Relevance to study: The Angel of the LORD traditions are relevant to the identity of the figure in Dan 10:5-6 (Christophany debate). FUT generally separates the Dan 10:5-6 figure from the Angel of the LORD/pre-incarnate Christ tradition, reading it as Gabriel or another angel.

ANGEL (a spirit)

Key sections relevant to this study: - Of different orders: ISA 6:2; 1TH 4:16; 1PE 3:22; Jude 1:9; REV 12:7 - Medium of revelation to prophets: DAN 4:13-17; 8:19; 9:21-27; 10:10-20 - Spiritual warfare: 2KI 6:16,17; DAN 10:6; 10:13,21; REV 12:7 - Appearances to Daniel: DAN 6:22; 8:16; 9:21; 10:5-10,16,18; 12:5-7

Relevance to study: The patron-angel schema (national spiritual warfare in Dan 10:13,20-21) is foundational to FUT's cosmic-conflict reading of Daniel 10. The prince of Persia and prince of Greece are territorial demons; Michael is Israel's patron archangel.

SEAL

Full Entry: - Documents sealed: 1KI 21:8; NEH 9:38; 10:1; ISA 8:16; EST 8:8; DAN 6:9; JER 32:10 - Treasures secured by: DEU 32:34 - Lion's den: DAN 6:17 - Figurative — of secrecy: DAN 12:9; REV 5:1 - Of certainty/divine approval: JHN 6:27; ROM 15:28; 2CO 1:22; EPH 1:13; 4:30; REV 7:3,4

Relevance to study: FUT's temporal-horizon argument depends on the seal/unseal contrast: Dan 12:4,9 (chatham — seal the book until time of the end) vs. Rev 22:10 (seal NOT the sayings). DAN 9:24 uses chatham for "seal up the vision and prophecy." The different commands argue for different temporal horizons.

DANIEL

Full Entry: - A Jewish captive, also called BELTESHAZZAR - Prophecies of: DAN 4:8,9; 7; 8; 9; 10; 11; 12; MAT 24:15 - Devoutness of: DAN 2:18; 6; 9; 10; 12; EZK 14:14

Relevance to study: Jesus' reference in Matt 24:15 ("spoken of by Daniel the prophet") is central to FUT's NT convergence argument — Jesus treats Daniel's prophecies as future.

AFFLICTION / TRIBULATION

Key sections: - Of Saints: To be expected (JHN 16:33; ACT 14:22) - Often severe: JOB 16:7-16; PSA 42:7; 66:12; JON 2:3; REV 7:14 - Design of: JER 24:5; DAN 4:25-27,34; HEB 12:5-11; REV 2:10 - National-level: JOL 1; 2; ISA 24:1-16

Relevance to study: Dan 12:1 ("time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation") parallels Matt 24:21 (thlipsis megale) and Jer 30:7 (time of Jacob's trouble). FUT reads all three as describing the same future Great Tribulation period.

PROPHECY

Key sections: - Inspired: ISA 28:22; LUK 1:70; 2TI 3:16; 2PE 1:21 - Sure fulfillment: EZK 12:22-25,28; HAB 2:3; MAT 5:18; 24:35 - Daniel's prophecies: DAN 7; 8; 9; 10; 11; 12; MAT 24:15 - Cessation of: LAM 2:9

Relevance to study: The prophecy entry's inclusion of Dan 11:30-45 alongside Matt 24:15 connects Daniel's willful king section to Jesus' Olivet Discourse.

  • ANCIENT OF DAYS (DAN 7:9,13,22) — confirms Daniel's consistent eschatological terminus
  • ARMAGEDDON (REV 16:16) — FUT connects to Dan 11:44-45 final campaign
  • TIME (DAN 7:25; 12:7) — time, times, half a time expression shared between Dan 7 and Dan 12